tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22297646.post116022731319520603..comments2023-10-31T09:33:01.781-04:00Comments on McilWeb: Fox News at 10Keith H. McIlwainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14661248415435540954noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22297646.post-1160411284652237112006-10-09T12:28:00.000-04:002006-10-09T12:28:00.000-04:00Here is a funny excerpt from a presidential news c...<A HREF="http://youtube.com/watch?v=1HMIT7UCC6Y" REL="nofollow">Here</A> is a funny excerpt from a presidential news conference, during which the Prez makes a little joke about the NY Times and gets some laughs...his body language is hilarious.Keith H. McIlwainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14661248415435540954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22297646.post-1160406229323413452006-10-09T11:03:00.000-04:002006-10-09T11:03:00.000-04:00Fox News is a far right organization, and with few...Fox News is a far right organization, and with few exceptions, does not really qualify as "news." It's more conservative commentary on the news than actual news. Anyone who depends on Fox for real news is a fool. It's like watching the Daily Show for your news. It just isn't news.<BR/><BR/>CNN , particularly since 1992, has been very moderate in its coverage. Still the best for pure journalism.<BR/><BR/>MSNBC is also more of a commentary channel, atleast in primetime, though it csn not be classified as right or left (Olberman is largely modertae, but very anti-Bush; on the other hand, Pat Buchanan is a political consultant).<BR/><BR/>CBS' Dan Rather debacle virtually killed network news. It wasn't so much biased journalism as just plain bad journalism. It was the nail in the coffin. <BR/><BR/>The NY Times continues to get hammered by the far right as being liberal, but I've seen no real proof positive of that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com